CS 880 : Complexity of Counting Problems

نویسندگان

  • Jin-Yi Cai
  • Chen Zeng
چکیده

The difference between EVALP(C,D) and EVAL(C,D) is that EVALP(C,D) fixes the value of a vertex w by i. We want to prove EVALP(C,D) ≡ EVAL(C,D). It is easy to see that EVAL(C,D) ≤ EVALP(C,D). Thus, we only need to prove the other direction. First, we define the notion of a discrete unitary matrix. Definition 1. Let F ∈ C be a matrix. We say F is M-discrete unitary for some positive integer M if 1. Every entry Fi,j is a root of unity, and M = lcm{ the order of Fi,j : i, j ∈ [m]} 2. F1,i = Fi,1 = 1 for all i ∈ [m] 3. For any i, j ∈ [m], i 6= j, 〈Fi,∗,Fj,∗〉 = 0 and 〈F∗,i,F∗,j〉 = 0 We can prove Lemma 1 by assuming the following pinning condition on the pair (C,D): 1. Every entry of F is a power of wN where wN = e 2πi/N for some positive integer N . 2. F is a discrete unitary matrix. 3. D is the 2m× 2m identity matrix.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Lecture 16 : CS 880 : Complexity of Counting Problems

03/15/2012 Lecture 16: CS 880: Complexity of Counting Problems Instructor: Jin-Yi Cai Scribe: Chen Zeng For a symmetric, bipartite matrix A ∈ C, we want to prove the following theorem: Theorem 1. If EVAL(A) is not #P-hard, then there exists an m × m purified bipartite matrix A such that EVAL(A) ≡ EVAL(A). Recall the definition of the purified bipartite matrix : Definition 1. Let A ∈ C be a symm...

متن کامل

CS 880 : Complexity of Counting Problems 02 / 14 / 2012

Instead of moving on and continuing to a full dichotomy of Holant∗(F) (where F is an arbitrary set of functions), we branch to another topic in counting complexity which involves algebraic techniques that we have not seen in the earlier lectures. Before we move on, we’ll look into how holographic transformations are used to establish dichotomy for a set of signatures Holant(F). For instance, co...

متن کامل

CS 880 : Complexity of Counting Problems 04 / 10 / 2012 Lecture 21 : Claims 8 . 2 - 8 . 4

Last time we stoped at the claim 8.2, where we showed D 2,a = λD 1,a a ∈ K and λ ∈ C, where K = {i ∈ [h]|D 1,i = 0} We ultimately want to show that the equality is correct for every a. Let us recal the vanishing lemma A that we will use it for the first time in this lecture: For a positive integer k and 1 ≤ i ≤ k, let {x i,n } n≥1 be k infinite sequences of non-zero real numbers.

متن کامل

CS 880 : Complexity of Counting Problems 02 / 16 / 2012 Lecture 8 : Universal Algebra

In today’s lecture, we will look more closely into Universal Algebra and the properties of invariants (Inv) and polymorphisms (Pol). We shall also look at a few key theorems that will help prove dichotomy in the following lectures. A universal algebra is an algebraic system consists of a structure A = (A,Γ) where A is the domain set (finite) and Γ is a set of relations on A with finite arity (Γ...

متن کامل

Dichotomy for Real Holantc Problems

Holant problems capture a class of Sum-of-Product computations such as counting matchings. It is inspired by holographic algorithms and is equivalent to tensor networks, with counting CSP being a special case. A classification for Holant problems is more difficult to prove, not only because it implies a classification for counting CSP, but also due to the deeper reason that there exist more int...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012